Scientists at the Particle accelorator in Switzerland and France may have succeded in speeding neutrinos to speeds above the speed of light. Just thinking that this could mean time travel is possible even if it was simple messages created with codes of particles. Interesting stuff.

McDermott does have sort of a high voice like Sedaris, but his vocal jesticulations are far more manic. Sedaris, though capable of being emotional, is usually a pretty cool headed guy.

Some of McDermott's philosophical points are interesting, but his beliefs about living in the past are totally silly, and he confuses being a luddite with the concept of timelessness. If he wants to fetishize the 19th century, that's certainly harmless and fun, and his eccentric character is interesting and perhaps worthy of incite, but most of the "points" he attempts to make are complete nonsense.

Take for example the line about how there's plenty to explore in the culture that is 1918; we can't keep up with what we have now versus what they had in 1918. So, how was 1918 any different in that respect to right now? It wasn't. No era has ever really appreciated what they had or what came before them or where they were going. And take a good look at 1918. There was plenty of really awful stuff going on that I'm glad we aren't seeing today.

I'm also gay, and I was kind of scratching my head about his whole business about thinking his sexual identity was an extinct medical condition. I, for one, am glad that being gay is now seen as part of one's identity and not a mental affliction. The fact that he heard nothing about it as a kid other than in dusty old medical journals just kind of illustrates the progression of public perception. In 1900, it was a strange, subversive social phenomenon akin to mental illness, perhaps even depravity, in 1920, it was rare, but novel and more or less treated with indifference, but from 1950 to 1980 it was (with obvious exceptions) an evil scourge that people preferred to not have to talk about at all. Thank god for progress.

And yeah, you know what, I'd rather be broken from sleep to go in a comparably sanitary toilet than have my room smell like pee from having a porcelain jar of pee sitting there festering, virtually begging airborne pathogens to come on in and get cozy.

Pretending its 1892 isn't being timeless, its just being kooky and nostalgic. The 19th century really wasn't that great. Yeah, cravats, high collars, curly mustaches and pocket watches are novel and interesting, but slavery, aggressive imperialism, manifest destiny, and steep disparities of social class are things I'm okay living without.

I think that its fine to revisit and reincorporate elements of our past, but I think its an entirely separate issue from any kind of theory of the illusion of time, and sticking your head in the sand and pretending that microwave ovens and iphones don't exist isn't noble, it's just kinda weird. I don't dislike McDermott for being weird, it just seems like he's suggesting that we all need to freeze ourselves in the past because it's somehow better for some reason, and none of his reasons made any sense.

That David McDermott is one wierd cat.

Where can i find more information on David McDermott? Nothing comes up on Google.

Seriously, what is the song at the end of this segment?

He's David Sedaris' voice doppleganger!

While David's perspective is fun to consider and think about, isn't it just a kind of kneejerk, escapist reaction to problems in society? Why romanticize the past (and ignore very real problems) instead of thinking about a better future?

Katie - I was thinking the exact same thing! big up to Radiolab and TAL

Is it just me or did that David McDermott sound scarily like David Sedaris. Weird!

What's the last song at the end of the David McDermott Section, it's awesome