Radiolab

Navigate
Return Home

14: The Four Groans

Wednesday, August 12, 2009 - 08:00 PM

Window Window (geezaweezer/flickr/CC-BY-2.0)

Another meditation on what happens after the moment of death, this time as Shakespeare envisions it. 

Ron Rosenbaum, author of The Shakespeare Wars, tells us about a very small variation in the text of Hamlet that makes a huge difference about how Shakespeare envisioned Hamlet’s dying moment. Then we pay a visit to Tony Award-winning actor Mark Rylance to get his take on encountering the edge of consciousness.

Tags:

More in:

Comments [8]

yeshara pryor from G.H.S philadelphia

The difference in suggestion of the "O,o,o,o" as Hamlet's last words are quite interesting. I especially like the idea that as Hamlet was dying, he saw 4 ghosts in his view and uttered an "O" for every ghost he saw. Thought Shakespeare didn't write those words, it does seem like his style, to use simple words or phrases that carry a great amount of detail within them. This reminds me of Act 5 Scene 1 when the Clown says; "if I drown myself wittingly, it argues an act, and an act hath three branches - it is tom act, to do, to perform". Might not be the same exact thing as "O,o,o,o" but it shows how Shakespeare has hidden meanings in his use of words and phrases.

Jan. 13 2014 07:21 PM

If Shakespeare didn't add "O, o, o, o" to the end of Hamlet, and the thinking is that it was an actor or folio editor, why are we having the argument?

The moans represent the possibility that it isn't silent afterall; but if Shakespeare ended it in a particular fashion, no moans, then perhaps that was his message to the audience. Silence.

Mar. 01 2012 01:12 PM
tobin

So.... this seemed related. Steve Jobs' last words:
http://www.thestar.com/business/companies/apple/article/1078605--the-repeated-last-words-of-steve-jobs

Oct. 31 2011 12:11 PM
Jeff

Gooseflesh-inducing. You guys consistently amaze me.

Aug. 26 2009 11:18 AM
Lulu Bee

Radio Lab rocks my soul. Thanks guys...thanks.

Aug. 25 2009 10:56 AM
The Guvnor

The actor is too literal. The four O's should not pronounced as such, but as one groan. Look to other Shakespeare plays and see a series of O's are shorthand for some audible grunt. Whether it be a roar or sigh, these were contextual cues of emotion.

Example from Macbeth, Act 4, in which Lady Macbeth is sleepwalking and being watched by a doctor and a servant:

LADY MACBETH
Here's the smell of blood still; all the perfumes of Arabia will not sweeten this little hand. O, O, O.

Here it is a sigh.

Now an example from Othello, Act 5, when Othello discovers his terrible error:

OTHELLO
O! O! O!

EMILIA
Nay, lay thee down and roar
For thou hast killed the sweetest innocent
That e'er did lift up eye.

As Emilia says, roar. Othello does not yodel "oh oh oh!"-- the O's are the equivalent to modern times onomatopoeia of grunts and exclamations like "Grahhh!" left to the actors interpretation.

Hearing Rylance's whimpering "oh... oh... oh... oh..." is like listening to a fundamentalist Christian rant about a 5,000-year-old Earth -- it is simply an uniformed artifact that should be corrected, not whimsically speculated about.

For more O,O,O,O info, here's a great essay by Martin Coyle (of which I base most of my post's argument) :
http://www2.lingue.unibo.it/ACUME/acumedvd/zone/research/essays/coyle.htm

Aug. 21 2009 04:27 PM
Steven

This meditation, and the ones before it, are stunning. That's all there is to say

Aug. 14 2009 10:47 PM
darwingodwin

oh, uh, ai, ow

Aug. 14 2009 02:57 AM

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Supported by

Feeds