- It's funny to think for me personally. I relate with what was said with regards to it is impossible practically to have invented something that which was not enabled by other collective ideas ect.. Since we "to me" are only as intelligent as what we have all collectively been exposed to via all means including the labels we use to express what it is we have been exposed to... just think if the most profoundly knowledgeable expressed themselves in a manner that transcended our collective understanding and interpretation of the "word expression" to describe whatever it is that we have discovered and or experienced would there only be a minimal number of individuals that could actually interpret what was being said with regards to that which has need to be expressed having to do with that which we all collectively do not know yet in order to come about realizations concerning our abilities to implement what is discovered and compile it as usable data with which to create that which is yet unknown? That which is yet unknown like some locations say in space are named/labeled so we that discover its existence afterwards can say that is what that is. I feel that inventive creativity is like the loose atoms of matter not yet discovered so as to collect to bond to form anything we can place a label onto it... hmmmm... Some rooms at MIT must sound like gibberish at times if a lay person were to sit in. This thread really has possibilities I think if they could break away from the fact that the spoon... does not want anything.
